Various factions in the House of Representatives Commission III requested the President, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono implement Constitutional Court decisions "lay off" Hendarman Supandji as attorney general. SBY should respond by appointing Attorney General ad interim.
"The Court's decision is final and binding so it should be implemented," said Syarifuddin Suding, Chairman of the Fraction Hanura who also sits on the charge of Commission III of the law. "President SBY should be submissive and obey the decision of the Court and immediately implement the decision," he said, Wednesday 22 September 2010.
Sudding officials suggested that there was an ad interim appointment of the Attorney General before any definitive. Therefore, the Attorney General's office that coordinated all prosecutors in Indonesia. "Though not retroactive, but with the decision of the Constitutional Court, the Attorney General that all policies Hendarman be unenforceable," said Sudding.
Meanwhile, another member of Commission III Herman Herry, requested that all parties should be wise to accept the decision of the Constitutional Court and must be taught a lesson in law enforcement forward.
In accordance with the decision of the Court, the Attorney General Hendarman Supandji since the decision of the Constitutional Court can no longer read any decision in the position of attorney general. Member of the Indonesian Democratic Party Struggle, said the President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono must immediately provisional decision to remove a letter or executive duties in line with the decision of the Constitutional Court.
"But the main point is clear. Pak Hendarman could not do anything more. Does mutation of position, especially related to the lawsuit," said Herman. Although the decision of the Court is not retroactive since October 2009 from Herman Herry sure there will be pros and cons related to the decision of the case which involves the Hendarman Supandji past year.
"Maybe there'll be asking all keputusaanya reviewed. But, to me there should be a middle way, because if we reject all of them, certainly too extreme. This is a lesson to law enforcement and all parties must be wise
accept it, "he said.
Herry Herman said with the decision of the Court in all matters in the hands of the attorney general suspended until a new attorney general. "There is no discussion about that considering the decision of the Constitutional Court are final and binding," said Herman.
Other responses are also provided by Trimedya Panjaitan. According Trimed familiar greeting, it's a slap to the government of SBY as administrative negligence is fatal to the law. Yusril assessed intelligent view of this legal gap that was never a concern of people over the years.
"This reinforces SBY immediately replace Attorney General Hendarman. This negligence is fatal SBY government. With that decision, there is no legal decision can be made by Toto as Attorney General. This is troublesome because the Court's decision is final and binding, "said the PDIP's politicians.
If you have this condition, according Trimedya, "In order not to vacuum, then the president should appoint the Attorney General ad interim."
However, the Chairman of Struggle PDI this law judge of the Constitutional Court's decision a little sissy and not firm because it is not retroactive. Yet when he speaks to law, the legal standing Yusril when filing the lawsuit because he felt clearly disadvantaged by the enactment of a suspect. "Not too many beneficial for Yusril, although I think with the Court's decision can not be detained Yusril," he said.
Earlier, Chairman of the Constitutional Court, Mahfud MD, declared by the decision of this Court then Hendarman no longer served the attorney general. "All the action as the Attorney General Hendarman Supandji until 14:30," said Mahfud. "We keep word of the verdict, was not allowed. That must be stopped since," said Mahfud.
Court declared Article 22 paragraph (1) letter d of Law Number 16 Year 2004 regarding the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia is in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 on parole (conditionally constitutional), ie along the interpreted constitutional "term of office of the Attorney General's ends with the end of the term of office of President of Republic of Indonesia in one period together tenure or dismissed cabinet members in his tenure by the President for the period. " (HS)
